Long form
Essays
The blog is where I think out loud. This is where I show the work. These are full papers, cited and argued, on the questions underneath everything else I write.
The papers
Biblical Theology
The Spine of the New Testament
Christ as Eschatological Fulfillment and the Interpretive Center of the Twenty-Seven Books
The New Testament is not an anthology of twenty-seven unrelated documents. This paper argues that Christ as eschatological fulfillment is the interpretive spine that holds them together, names the sub-themes that hang off it, and answers the strongest competing candidates: kingdom, glory, covenant, and union with Christ.
2,893 words · 14 min read · Turabian, citedRead the essay →Biblical Theology
The Kingdom of God
Reign, Realm, and the Citizen's Life Between Eden and Eternity
Kingdom language runs from Genesis to Revelation, and most confusion about it comes from collapsing reign into realm. This paper distinguishes the two, traces the kingdom already inaugurated and not yet consummated, and asks what citizenship in it actually requires of a man now.
2,134 words · 11 min read · Turabian, citedRead the essay →Hermeneutics
Typology and Shadows
The Discipline of Reading the Old Testament Toward Christ
Typology is either the most fruitful discipline in Old Testament reading or the most abused, and the difference is method. This paper defines a type, separates it from allegory, sets the controls that keep a reader honest, and works through examples where the shadow genuinely resolves in Christ.
2,592 words · 13 min read · Turabian, citedRead the essay →Law and Gospel
The Believer and the Law
Covenant Transfer, the Fulfillment of Moses, and the Law of Christ
If the Mosaic law was given as a unit and ended as a unit, the obvious question is what now governs a Christian. This paper answers with the law of Christ, works through what carried forward and what did not, and takes seriously the charge that this position collapses into lawlessness.
2,529 words · 13 min read · Turabian, citedRead the essay →Covenant Theology
The Covenants of Scripture
Promise, Law, Kingdom, and the Covenant That Replaced Them
Covenant is the architecture of the Bible, and how the covenants relate decides most other disagreements downstream. This paper walks the biblical covenants in order, argues for genuine discontinuity at Sinai rather than one covenant in successive administrations, and states plainly where the competing systems are strongest.
1,997 words · 10 min read · Turabian, citedRead the essay →Ecclesiology
Israel and the Church
Incorporation Without Replacement, and the People of God in Romans 9 through 11
The relationship between Israel and the church is where covenant systems are tested, and both replacement and two-peoples answers overreach. This paper argues for one people of God in Christ while holding to a future large-scale turning of ethnic Israel, and works through Romans 9 to 11 to get there.
2,054 words · 10 min read · Turabian, citedRead the essay →Eschatology
The Future
Eschatology as the Goal of History, and the Shape of Living Toward It
Eschatology is not the chapter at the back of the book; it is the doctrine of where history is going, and it silently governs how everything else gets read. This paper argues an amillennial structure with a partial-preterist reading of the judgment texts, concedes the two places that reading is weakest, and asks what any of it changes on a Tuesday.
2,556 words · 13 min read · Turabian, citedRead the essay →Passage studies
New Testament Exegesis
The Spirits in Prison
Suffering, Vindication, and the Reign of Christ in 1 Peter 3:18-22
First Peter 3:18-22 is the passage most readers skip, because Christ makes a proclamation to spirits in prison and nobody agrees who they are. This paper works the text closely, argues the proclamation is an announcement of victory over rebel spirits rather than an offer of salvation to anyone, faces the sentence that says baptism now saves you instead of routing around it, and concedes the four places the reading is weakest.
3,380 words · 17 min read · Turabian, citedRead the essay →New Testament Exegesis
Let Your Yes Be Yes
Oaths, Evasion, and the Word of a Man in Matthew 5:33-37
Jesus says to make no oath at all, and the church has never agreed on whether he meant it. This paper argues that the target is the graded system of oath formulas his contemporaries used to sound binding while keeping an escape open, rather than the solemn oath itself, and it rests the case on Matthew's own later chapter instead of on the grammar. It concedes at five points that the absolutist reading has arguments this position does not fully answer, and it ends where the passage does, on why a man needed the scaffolding in the first place.
4,856 words · 23 min read · Turabian, citedRead the essay →